Perhaps the downpours added to the list of
apologies (11) but the there was still a good turn out in the Glenferness Hall
last night (Tuesday), very good indeed compared to some of the low attendances that
can be seen in Nairn where thousands of members of the public within walking
distance of Community Council meetings. A cup of tea and a choice of cake and
biscuits got everyone chatting before the event but the subject matter soon
became serious as the meeting proper began. The chair, Debbie MacBean, began by asking the three
Highland Councillors present (Liz, Laurie and Colin) how they saw Council rural
policy developing over the next couple of years.
Liz said that it would be important to work
with the Community Council and listen to their concerns and take on board any
ideas the council had for their community, she thought also that roads and
transport issues were an important concern. Liz said there would be particular
issues in the forthcoming cuts consultation that would have relevance for rural
areas.
Colin said he thought it was about being
responsive to individuals where ever they were in the Nairn ward and to
individual community councils and that shouldn’t make a difference whether they
were in the town or whether they were rural. If it was council specific and
council action required then he saw it as his job. “Your agenda is our agenda,”
said Colin.
For Laurie
it was about trying to preserve
employment in rural areas he was also concerned about the level of housing in
rural areas. To him, if housing is done in small isolated pockets it could put
pressure on council services, things like school transport. He didn’t have a problem with farms
converting steadings and creating small community groups. He realised roads
were a problem and acknowledged the low levels of cash available for repairs
and improvements. He mentioned broadband and how it was unlikely there would be
much immediate improvement in availability.
The chair pointed out that broadband in
East Nairnshire came from the Forres side and was onlly a small exchange
and with hardly any numbers left so residents would get split lines and only 0.5 was
available for broadband and most of the time you were getting less. The
realities of what some of us might consider an idyllic country life are often
not apparent.
The meeting then moved onto planning issues
and how a recent decision that went to planning review had given a serious blow
to morale of the East Nairnshire team and particularly John Rawlinson who had
done a massive amount of research and had worked with the planners to bring
about the best outcome for the community concerning in relation to a housing
development. In the end a compromise had been reached with 2 of the houses in
the project having been rejected, only to be overturned at a review meeting of
non-local councillors. One of those councillors paid very little attention to
the material presented according to John and made a comment that to him
belittled the process. The members present at Glenferness last night thought
that had been very unfair and were looking for assurance from the three
Highland Councillors present that their input would be taken seriously in the
future. With Tornagrain events looming over the day’s proceedings, that was a
hard assurance for them to give to this observer’s perceptions. Planning in the
Highlands still faces challenges at macro and micro levels.
Overall there is concern that there is not
enough infrastructure in the rural hinterland of Nairnshire to cope with the
demand for development or could you be as bold to say, re-population of the countryside?
If you look at Census figures towards the end of the nineteenth century it is
ironic to consider that the population of East
Nairnshire was more than double/triple
what it is now. Then almost everyone worked on the land, a situation that is long
gone and today as people move into the Countryside to live, many of them
commute to work elsewhere or have retired to the area but will still need to
make almost daily trips into town. Their children need transporting into town
for schooling and the new country way of life finds itself in the front line of
dwindling provision. In reality will they ever have the power to shout loud
enough to compete with the towns (and city) of the Highlands for a fairer share of
those services? Will some townies even be bothered that some country folk think
they are not getting a fair share? Rural problems are out of sight out of mind
to the average urban dwewller?
For us in the town in the winter it is a
case of even the able bodied being in danger of coping over on the ungritted
High Street pavements but up in the Country it can be just as dangerous or life
threatening. The 3 Highland Councillors heard how the snow plough across the
Dava to Carrbridge only goes as far as Lochindorb before it turns back, another
one comes up from Carrbridge to finish the job. So in the winter if wishing to
travel south that way to catch a train in Carrbridge or Aviemore to continue
south (this observer knows folk in Nairn who like to do that too given the
parking problems in Inverness), drivers can travel on a safe gritted road for
half of their journey only to have to decide whether to risk the rest of it or
cancel their journey and return home.
The dial-a-bus is accused of being a less than perfect service to some and there seems to be legitimate complaints about the bus not
being available at times when it is being used on a school runs etc or as the
later end of the daily service availability nears. Something that is half-taxi,
half-bus, that has to sort out routes on a daily basis to meet ever changing
demands is always destined to be a service that would not please everybody but
the three visitors from Nairn went away with specific complaints to follow up.
School transport or to be more exact safety
issues around school transport was discussed too. Finding safe pick up spots on
the country roads and turning points for the vehicles too was something that
looks as though it has exercised the minds of the community councillors on many
occasions. When travelling back to Nairn this observer noticed a bus stop that
had been discussed, thousands of drivers passing that way would probably never
give it a second thought but then you try and imagine 20 children waiting there
around a bus stop 2ft back from the road. A bus stop too, that fills up with
snow as the ploughs pass by too, thus you can visualise the dangers. Even
within the confines of the paltry sums available surely these accidents waiting
to happen can be fixed. Issues like that seem to be reasonable demands to this
observer. There was a suggestion too that the buses should be made to fit
winter tyres as part of their contract conditions. Again Liz, Colin and Laurie
will look at that. Laurie urged those present to report any other safety
defects on the buses to the police however, given that they ordered an unsafe
bus immediately off the road in the past after observing a fault.
“We have the same problems we had 10 years
ago,” said one councillor. Sadly the likelihood is that East Nairnshire will still have
some of these problems in ten years time just as in the town, we too, will still
be talking about some of the problems we face today. The volunteer Community
Councillors of East Nairnshire are working hard for their patch and their
Highland Council representatives are listening but dark clouds still loom over
local government financing. What can be done? Maybe a certain vote coming up in
2014 offers a different and more optimistic future for rural and urban areas of
Scotland alike.
2 comments:
East Nairnshire and all other Community Councils have every right to feel angry and disenfranchised at the laughable state of the current planning system.
Each of the recent 'improvements' to the way that planning is processed has resulted in less public involvement, in spite of each and every 'improvement' being lauded as the one that does the exact opposite.
Anyone expecting planning officials to take notice of Community Council opinion, however well researched and valid , is living in la-la land.
Community Councils are no longer even statutory consultees, so they don't automatically get informed of a planning application in their area, unless someone deems the application worthy of their attention.
Community Councils presented with planning documents for their opinions may as well write 'Do as you will' on them, & send them back to Inverness , because however much effort is put in to producing a well balanced , democratic response , that's exactly what the planners will do.
As has been seen this week with the Tornagrain application, even elected Highland Councillors have been engineered out of the equation in some cases.
As Spurtle says, rural Nairnshire communities and the people of Nairn town are all victims of the current high-handed approach of Highland Council planners.
The planning officials pay lip service to a process of consultation, but then ignore all local comment or opinion, however well-founded.
The Tornagrain discussion was only the latest example of how officials manipulate the process to prevent elected Councillors from raising legitimate and genuine concerns about planning proposals. It was shocking to observe how official "advisers", legal or otherwise, sought to muzzle elected representatives.
The solution lies in the hands of our elected councillors. They are best placed to require their own officials to rewrite the rules so as to permit proper debate, rather than allowing themselves to be so comprehensively stitched up.
When the planning process is so blatantly abused, it is we - the local communities - who suffer.
Post a Comment