Tonight Alistair Noble goes to River
Community Council with his Nice Vision for Nairn. Last week he was with the
Westies and found unanimous support. River might prove slightly different
however, this observer predicts he will receive a courteous, respectful welcome
but issues between River and West over the bus station issue and one or two
other matters may provoke an underlying tension between some members of River
and the NICE organisation – some West Councillors have dual membership of West
and NICE and to this observer this may influence some on River. It would be
difficult for NICE to project itself as an organisation that enjoyed town-wide
support without the official blessing of River. Tonight’s meeting 8 p.m.
in the URC Church will certainly be important, but perhaps not crucial, to the future
of Alistair’s initiative for Nairn.
Also important for NICE aims and ambitions
in the town will be the planning site visit at the bus station tomorrow at 09.30 a.m. The Councillors will come to town on a bus and then head back to Inverness to decide if 16 flats
should be built on the site of the old garage.
Other news from the Community Councils last
week. At West concern was expressed about Viewfield House. Some present felt
that the building was deteriorating and the Highland Council were not doing enough
to maintain it. This observer had a look at the weekend and the first signs of
decay can perhaps be seen if you look upwards.
At River it was revealed that another group
are bidding to occupy the Links School building. Gurnites will remember that the artists from the BlueDoor Studios want to move in, with assistance for their bid from the Scottish
Arts Group WASPS. The Highland Facilitator team have also stepped forward. They
are an independent not-for-profit environmental group who enable, engage and
empower young people who are affected or suffer from long term illness and/or
disability. They are currently based in Ardersier but are all for moving into
Nairn if the Highland Council accept their offer to lease the building.
A representative told River CC: “Developing
community involvement in both the management and running of the Links School is a
key factor in our proposal. An example of this is an HFT partner is keen to
erect a sound studio within the building, to which people in Nairn would have
access and use as well.”
Simon Noble told River CC that he thought
that it would be useful to have a meeting of the residents surrounding the
untended areas between Sutors
Avenue and Sutors View in
the Lochloy development to enable them to come up with some options as to what
should be done. Posible options could include allotments, a community orchard
or a garden. He said that it was clear that Highland Council had no legal
obligation for the area and certainly had no wish to be come involved.
4 comments:
It would be good to think that all Nairn residents, wherever they live, would be willing to work together to try to make the town better. In any such process there are bound to be tensions and differences of view. The challenge is in how we come together to resolve them.
At least NICE is trying to promote such collaboration. It would be unfortunate if - as the Gurn suggests - River CC were to be seen as having some sort of veto over their efforts. To say that NICE cannot succeed unless it has "the official blessing of River" is unhelpful.
We all have to hope that River CC, and others in Nairn, will choose to engage constructively, rather than to obstruct, complain or exercise a veto.
It would be NICE if the URC tonight would actually stand for United Renewed Community. The old saying, "united we stand divided we fall" has a lot of truth to it. Nairn is a Small Town and would benefit from less fragmentation and more cooperation.
Are some nice supporters coming at all this with an attitude of moral and intellectual superiority?
It is very laudable that NICE want to do things for Nairn. Perhaps it's the way they are going about it that pisses people off? Their presentation gives the impression on the one hand that they want to engage but on the other that they already have business plans and projects in place. Maybe they need to adjust their presentation, and their supporters stop being so defensive and get off of their high horses? Or, will this comment get me accused as being negative and obstructive as it seems if you are not with them, you're against them?
Post a Comment