At the joint Community Council meeting
tonight (Wednesday) in the URC hall a couple of high heid yins from the
Highland Council planning department were taking soundings on South Nairn from
the councils followed by a question and answer session for members of
the public. Very interesting it was too and we hope to bring you snippets from
the highly charged, but calm, debate over the next few days. For tonight
however, here’s something interesting that Liz said during the proceedings:
“I’d like to come in just about the by-pass
issue. I’d said to Iain Ramage when he interviewed me last week about the development.
He said: “Could it be possible that the development may start before the bypass
is there?” And you know, anything is possible but, however, our TECS officers
are going down tomorrow to speak in Edinburgh about the
bypass. So hopefully in the next week or so I will be able to report back an
update from that. But just to let you know we’ve not forgotten about the bypass,
we’re still trying to pursue it but the bottom line is I can’t promise people
there will be a bypass before the development starts. I just wanted to make
that clear because the headlines were we’ve forgotten all about the bypass or
whatever it was. That’s not the case at all. We’re still pushing for it, it’s
still very important for the town and, just to clear that up and our officers
are meeting tomorrow down in Edinburgh with Transport Scotland .”
This week the article Liz refers to appears
on the front page of the Nairnshire and is entitled “Long wait for the bypass.”
Surprise anyone? The article also quotes comment from Michael Green who is
concerned that the infrastructure is not there to enable South Nairn to go ahead. Michael’s
view is shared by the town’s three Community Councils and their views were laid
out in front of the planners tonight. More about that in future articles this
week. Liz was perhaps stung by the paper’s editorial more than anything that
emerged on the front page. Iain Bain titled his latest hebdominal musings “Bypass off the boil” and he began:
“It is disappointing that Nairn Provost Liz
MacDonald now considers that Nairn’s bypass project may not take place until
housing development including south Nairn is on the ground. It is perhaps a
measure of how priorities are changing in the SNP dominated Highland Council
and Scottish Government.”
In response to that Liz obviously wanted to
lay out her stall and state that the bypass is still very much on her agenda. Iain
Bain went on to state in his editorial that it “had become almost an axiom of
local development – that there should be no substantial development until a
bypass was in existence or at least very definitely in plan.”
As we stated above the three Community Councils earlier tonight said
they didn't want development until there is a bypass but against a possible
appeal one day by a developer, who might have been turned down on those grounds,
would that be a viable position to take? The planners didn't seem to think so tonight - again more on that later this week.
At the very least, before any development goes ahead at Nairn South, major improvements need to be carried out to Cawdor Road, especially the Railway Brae area. With the increase of traffic now coming from the doctors surgery plus additional traffic from any developements there are going to be severe problems in the future in this area.
ReplyDeleteThere is a school of thought emerging in official circles that feels that traffic lights may be the solution here.
ReplyDeleteAgain we'll get round to this if time permits.
Yes Graisg. Perversely, the official planners or their advisers suggest that the way to deal with a major increase in traffic flow along narrow streets and through the underpass is to install more obstructions: narrow the road, widen the pavement, put in lights and build traffic calming measures (chicanes or humps).
ReplyDeleteHow that will ease or improve the smooth flow of traffic, ensure swift access to the hospital for emergencies, and avoid tailbacks is um, not immediately obvious.....
Thank you Lamplighter - it all has to be digested with the aid of details of the conversation between Malcolm MacLeod and Brian Stewart about how the traffic model used initially in all this originated.
ReplyDeleteHopefully we will cover some of this but please don't forget to reserve your copy of the Leopold Street Thunderer next Tuesday! They will no doubt be examining the issues debated last night.
http://www.highland.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/DB124322-CC8C-4A8B-BA72-CF9617CDBFA5/0/HighlandwideLocalDevelopmentPlanFinalReportbyScottishMinisters20December2011.pdf
ReplyDeleteI strongly urge those with any concerns about any element of proposals for Nairn South to read/remind themselves of the detailed analysis of the Reporter with respect to 'Issue 18 Nairn South' at the link about. The need for a bypass is covered as is the need for other potential modifications to the road network.
Has anyone discussed the effects for some Nairn businesses if and when we get the bypass?
ReplyDeleteIt might mean a better quality of life for those who live near the A96, but it will also mean less traffic stopping in the town to buy something or even find somewhere to stay?
Will Nairn become a ghost town of it's former self?
South Side Development.
ReplyDeleteO dear if we are to wait for a bypass the development is along way away. Also do the complainers understand what a by pass is?? it is not a commutator road it will BY PASS the town for through traffic and go no where the development. Yes improvements need to be made but trying to stop the development of the aria will not solve the problem but going ahead WILL and give much needed work to all trades increase spending in the town.It makes me wonder if any of the objectors know that one of the first things that take place on any building sight is for services to be put in place and then the buildings. So lets get men into work and create houses for those who need them
As far as I am aware there is a great deal of land currently available for building, most with permission, where men - and surely women also - could 'get to work'.
ReplyDeleteIn Nairn there is a development brief for Sandown. There's permission for all sorts of development on a huge site at Delnies. And is there not land at Lochloy still?
At Ardersier there has been outline permission for around 1950 dwellings since 2006 and nothing as yet has come of the plans.
Near to the tiny hamlet of Tornagrain there is now OPP for a settlement of around 5000 dwellings, with detailed planning expected in the not too distant future (?)for a part first phase.
Just to the East of Inverness there is Outline permission was a large development (2,500? units); where around 300 units could be built before the schools would need to expand.
Then, of course, there is the building work that is going on at the Uni and all the planned work on the roads in the area.
The SAC are relocating to Beechwood Campus and will be selling their old Inverness site (which will be freed up for residential building as far as I understand)
Lots more sites are planned through the Inner Moray Firth.
And let us not forget the that there is permission for a huge business park site at the airport where the B park is to be built out over a period to 2060!
The issue is not lack of land (or allocation of sites) as far as I can see but whether or not enough people are in a position to buy what is built, at the prices charged, in enough numbers to fund the provision of 'affordable' housing.
Google is playing up at the moment so I cannot get hold of relevant links.
Yes and of course its is swings and roundabouts with a bypass.
Please see item
ReplyDelete'Bovis Adds to Housebulding Optimism.'
At link:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a417cba6-6141-11e2-957e-00144feab49a.html#axzz2IuMEyQeb
Article reports on house builders profits boosted by sale of homes on land bought at knock down prices and talks of them building more lucrative family homes with focus on more resiliant London and South East market. Operating profit margins up from 11% to 13.5%.
It always amuses me when someone cites the number of jobs which will be created when it comes to these type of developments. Let's be realistic, these are short term jobs which, very often, don't go to local people but to workers brought in by the, very often, outside contractors.
ReplyDeletei always found that if someone felt strongly enough about something why would they hide behind anonymity hence i never read them or give them any credence john gallagher fishertown
ReplyDeleteIt's a bit hard to know who's who on the world wide web John, and the Gurn has allowed anonymous comments for many years.
ReplyDeleteSome names you see on here may be real, they may not, and others just use the anonymous identity because it suits
People freely express their views here, debate sometimes happens, and we can all express ourselves 24/7 unlike a newspaper - brilliant
Oh for christ's sake lighten up you lot. How bad can it be? It's all relative you know. I was quite chirpy, now feel like my stilettos are sinking into the quaggy quagmire. P XX
ReplyDeleteCan you get different types of quagmire other than quaggy ones then?
ReplyDelete