First a note for local planning students. Here
at Gurn HQ we have been browsing a document which will go before the Planning,
Environment and Development committee in Inverness on Wednesday. The document is a draft strategic masterplan forphases 1 & 2 of Nairn South. Students of South Nairn matters may wish to
browse this document and the recommendations and details prefacing it from
Council officials. Here is one little gem:from the prefacing spiel, the fifth
item on the list from 2.2 The main issues that were highlighted and agreed were:
and that item is “that a maximum of 320 houses could be built as supported by existing
traffic impact assessment”.
Plenty there to digest then. Back to the Firhall Bridge and now we
wish to refer to a map on page 8 of the draft masterplan. The map shows the
network of paths proposed across South Nairn . The rights of way along the bottom and side of Firhall would be
improved and there would one day be a path further along that side of the
river. There would be paths across the new developments. This would give all
the folk living in the present western suburbs the opportunity to cross the
railway via a new bridge and walk down to the river through South Nairn and the rights of
way. Firhall Bridge wouldn’t simply be one end of a circular walk it would be a pivotal
junction in a large network of paths. You could come from South Nairn or the other side
of the railway and head for Cawdor or in the direction of other improved paths on that
bank of the river. An investment in a ramp now would make much of this
accessible to the maximum number of existing and future residents of the town
in the next few years, should building start at South Nairn . Have a look on page 8 of the Council document here to see the map that shows proposed and existing paths and roads in the
area.
NB earlier this week we posted a press release from Charles Allenby's agents listing his concerns about the South Nairn draft masterplan. Many Gurnshire students of planning matters have already digested it but if you haven't seen it yet here it is.
Perhaps the developer would like to pay for the bridge improvements as an early goodwill gesture?
ReplyDelete