Planning is a complicated subject, it is clouded in the
language of officialdom and reports that are capable of giving the average
citizen a headache after two or three paragraphs. It can seem impenetrable but
it affects our lives and at many times in recent years it has upset large
sections of the local community. It finally led to people taking to the streets
earlier this week to express their outrage at how they felt they had been badly treated by the system.
We are about to be consulted on planning again over a six
week period this time on the IMFLDP – The Inner Moray Firth Development Plan.
This observer will now try and talk about this a little but it is very
complicated. Gurnites will know that there is a strong school of thought in
Nairnshire that you get consulted and then you get what officialdom wants. The outcome
of consultation over the HwLDP appeared
to be like that to many – confusing isn’t it – that’s the Highland wide Development Plan. The application at South Nairn was in the HwLDP and thus enshrined and hard to dislodge.
This video interview with Alastair Noble might help a little to enlighten
readers a little to the background of the HwLDP. It really seems that the system is so
complicated that you almost have to do a course to bring yourself up to speed
to even begin to seriously consider it and how we arrived where we are today
with the situation we have in Nairn. Obviously in the longer term there must be
serious questions here for politicians in the landscape of whatever Scotland
that comes after the referendum next year. Do we really have to go on like this
with such a system? Here’s what our correspondent APT Sec says:
"I am really concerned that Highland have now made
planning so complicated that the ordinary person simply turns off. And, it seems to me, there should not be a situation
where the Government and Planning Authorities provide only basic knowledge of
the planning system but the reality is that you need far more than that to even
attempt to make your voice heard effectively."
Now the HwLDP is already done and dusted and we now have more local consultation under this IMFLDP. But how will what has gone through on the
big boy HwLDP affect the consultation of the IMFLDP? The APT Sec is pretty good
at going through all this stuff and she is slightly concerned and has spotted
something in the report that went before the Council on Weds for the item on
the consultation (that was the same meeting where the South Nairn application
was turned down). Here is the extract she highlights and I warn you we are
going into planning speak now:
‘…4.3 The HwLDP includes some development sites (and
corresponding text) that lie within the Inner Moray Firth (IMF) area. These
sites have been tested through an independent Examination and so the principle
of development has been accepted. The vast majority of these sites have been
“rolled forward” into the Proposed Plan with little or no change. It is
therefore intended that any Proposed Plan content that was previously approved
through the HwLDP should not be reexamined through the IMFLDP process. At the
Examination stage of the plan we will ask Reporters to acknowledge that the
principle of development of these sites has already been accepted, and that
only the Plan content that was not previously approved through the HwLDP should
be subject to Examination through the IMFLDP process. Minor changes such as the
mix of uses or phasing would be open to comment. Some of the same sites now
have an extant planning permission, for example at Delnies, Tornagrain and
Stratton. It is intended to take a similar approach to these sites.”
APTSec goes on to ask herself and the Gurn: “Have the
Councillors of the PEDC now effectively agreed to close off any further
discussion on what is set out on page 51-58 inclusive of the HwLDP as far as Nairn is concerned with the
exception of ‘minor changes’?”
Another acronym there “PEDC” (Planning, Environment and
Development Committee). Our correspondent then asks: “Clarification is needed
surely? People are surely entitled to an
explanation as to what the implications of this would mean? How would their consultation comments be
regarded; would some be disregarded?
Will this be fully explained upfront?”
This observer wonders too how it will all work. Will we get
a map showing us the sacrosanct parts of the Big Boy HwLDP where comment is
perhaps of no use and the areas where our input can still be of some value. How does the community express what it
considers acceptable when it comes to how Nairn develops? Are too many avenues
of debate now sealed up with No Entry signs by the Big Boy HwLDP?
You can see debate on this matter from earlier this week at the
Highland Council on this webcast on the Highland Council site at 2 hours 36 minutes.
How will the consultation work? Here’s a couple of
paragraphs from the Council’s own report (Liz pointed the Gurn in the direction
of these two paragraphs, she is concerned about the six week time frame and
thinks it should be longer). See other comment from Liz in this Gurn article.
“5.1 The Proposed Plan approved by Committee
will represent the settled view of the Council for guiding future development
in the Inner Moray Firth area. However, the Proposed Plan will be subject to
full public consultation. The Proposed Plan has been designed as an interactive
document which is easy to navigate and make comments on. An online comments
form has been designed to make it easy for users to submit their comments to
the Council and to help streamline the consultation process. An updated
Environmental Report will be subject to consultation alongside the Proposed
Plan.
5.2 Previous stages in the preparation of
the Plan have included extensive public consultation and publicity. The
Proposed Plan consultation is proposed to last for 6 weeks. It is an important
stage as it is likely to be the last opportunity for people to make comments
that can be considered in the subsequent Examination process. During the
consultation officers will attend Ward Forums to inform the public of the
opportunity to comment and to explain the next stages in the plan process.
Social media, press adverts and a radio campaign will help to raise awareness
of the consultation. The Council is also required to write to every property
within a 20 metre distance of the boundary of any site allocated in the
Proposed Plan to inform them that the Council proposes to allocate the site for
development. These letters will be accompanied by a map of the relevant area or
settlement with details of how they can make comments on the proposed plan.”
Did you get this far? Well done! So there it
is Gurnites, worth bearing in mind and no doubt the usual suspects will be debating this at their meetings over the next few weeks.
No comments:
Post a Comment